Tuesday, July 20, 2010

Thursday, December 17, 2009

The mystery planes

Commercial aircraft are identified by two numbers:

(1) Flight numbers assigned by airline companies as part of their flight schedules for particular routes on particular days.

(2) Tail numbers affixed to each aircraft that stay with that plane at all times regardless of their assigned flight number.

Here are both sets of numbers for the 9/11 aircraft:

Flight AA 11 (N334AA)
Flight UA 175 (N612UA)
Flight UA 93 (N591UA)
Flight 77 (N644AA).

Blogger Aidan Monaghan has made an FOI request of the Bureau of Transportation Statistics which keeps records of all US commercial airline flights.

The BTS has confirmed that the planes N334AA, N612UA and N591UA were not flown commercially anywhere in the US for nine months prior to 911.

They provided no response about N644AA.

This is an official confirmation that 3 of the hijacked planes on 9/11 had been out of commercial service for a full nine months before they were hijacked. On their very first day back in service all 3 planes were hijacked and destroyed. What are the chances of that? And what is the explanation for what these planes were doing for those hidden nine months?

And even the Flight numbers are suspect. According to Wikipedia:

Two American Airlines aircraft were hijacked and crashed during the September 11, 2001 Terrorist Attack: Flight 77 (a Boeing 757) and Flight 11 (a Boeing 767).

Although these flights were daily departures before and a month after September 11, 2001. Neither flight 11 nor 77 were scheduled on September 11, 2001. The records kept by the Bureau of Transportation Statistics (www.bts.gov/gis/) do not list either flight that day.

Remarkably, this Wiki amendment can be sourced to American Airlines itself!

It gets worse. Aidan Monaghan made a July 18, 2008 FOI request to the National Transportation Safety Board which revealed that they possessed no records indicating how wreckage recovered from the crashed aircraft was positively identified as belonging to the 4 planes reportedly hijacked that day or even if such wreckage was positively identified at all. The NTSB took no steps to confirm the identies of the crashed aircraft of 911, steps they were required to undertake by Federal statute. Instead, the appear to have relied on assurances from FBI officials supervising the crash sites that the aircraft were the ones they claimed.

So we have three major anomalies:

(1) The missing nine months of flights N334AA, N612UA and N591UA.

(2) The confirmation from American Airlines that Flights 11 and 77 simply do not appear on any flight schedules for Sept 11.

(3) No statutory confirmation of the identity of any of the crashed planes.

What we have here is kabuki, a form of theatre in which the US public have been told a story of what happened on 911 with no independent check of the details. We simply have no clear proof of what planes flew or crashed on 911.

Sunday, June 14, 2009

A danish scientist Niels Harrit, on nano-thermite in the WTC dust ( english subtitles )

Thursday, May 21, 2009

WeAreChange LA Questions VicePresident of the U.S.A. Biden on 9/11 and Nano-thermite

We are change L.A. managed to get the only question asked, and every single person present walked away from that event with the question about scientific proof for military grade explosives used in the destruction of the Twin Towers on their mind.

Monday, October 27, 2008

On October 22, 2008, Yukihisa Fujita, Congressman for the Democratic Party of Japan made a 20 minute speech on the floor of the Japanese Diet or House of Representatives. For the third time this year he directly questioned the official version of 9/11..

Structural engineering council casts doubt on NIST’s WTC 7 Report.

The Council on Tall Buildings and Urban Habitat (CTBUH) has published comments on the NIST WTC 7 Report. The CTBUH questions critical points of the NIST WTC 7 collapse theory and also highlights problems with the writing NIST report itself.
The CTBUH criticisms focus on two technical issues The conjectured failure of shear studs and bolts on the supposedly critical Column 79:Read HERE

Monday, September 15, 2008

Russian Poll: 84% Say Truth About 9/11 Being Deliberately Hidden

A new poll from a major Russian news outlet reveals that 84% believe that the truth behind the 9/11 attacks is being deliberately hidden by the U.S. government.Read HERE

Thursday, September 11, 2008

Dear Reporter: Looking for a Story about 9/11?
If you're looking for a story for the 7th anniversary of 9/11, you can interview one of the following people:

A 9/11 Commissioner
A Congress member
A military leader
An intelligence professional
A scientist
A structural engineer or architect
A legal scholar
A victim's family members or heroic first responder
A psychiatrist or psychologist
Or one of the thousands of other highly-credible people who question 9/11But you just want to cover nonsensical stories of McCain and Obama threatening to "get" Osama Bin Laden and fight the "war on terror" more effectively, don't you? Oh well, that's why your company is losing viewers and readers ... people want real news! Source George Washington's Blog

Wednesday, September 10, 2008

More video analysis of anomilies in tower collapse.Look closely at the explosions exiting the building

9/11 Truth Film To Be Broadcast On Prime Time Russian TV

Russian State TV is to broadcast a feature length documentary that questions the official version of events surrounding 9/11 to mark the seventh anniversary of the attacks.
DPA News Agency reports that up to 30 million Russian citizens will see Italian film maker Giulietto Chiesa’s ZERO, set to be shown at prime time on a major Russian television channel on September 12th.Read HERE

Friday, July 11, 2008

The 9/11 Chronicles: Part One, Truth Rising (Alex Jones' new film)

Tuesday, July 08, 2008

Pull It..explained again! for the benefit of the BBC

The BBC Hit piece on WTC 7 included (around 20 minutes into the film; which can be viewed below) the Larry Silverstein comment 'pull it' without going into the fact that this phrase is a demolition term meaning to bring the building down.In the clip below the unedited version that was not used in the BBC's debacle can be viewed.

Alex Jones & Jason Bermas dissect BBC WTC 7 Documentary(AUDIO)

14 minutes, 49 seconds. Direct MP3 download.

Saturday, April 12, 2008

U.N. Official Calls for Study Of Neocons' Role in 9/11

WASHINGTON — A new U.N. Human Rights Council official assigned to monitor Israel is calling for an official commission to study the role neoconservatives may have played in the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks.
On March 26, Richard Falk, Milbank professor of international law emeritus at Princeton University, was named by unanimous vote to a newly created position to report on human rights in the conflict between Israel and the Palestinian Arabs. While Mr. Falk's specialty is human rights and international law, since the attacks in 2001, he has devoted some of his time to challenging what he calls the "9-11 official version." Read HERE

Monday, March 31, 2008

This is an Orange

Call For New 9/11 Investigation Reaches Crescendo

Calls for a new 9/11 inquiry are reaching a crescendo, with well-respected authorities and celebrities alike adding their voices to the cause, as the official 9/11 story crumbles under the weight of revelations of White House ties to the 9/11 Commission, and other cover-ups on behalf of authorities staffed with investigating the attacks.
The corporate media's insistence on ignoring hundreds of professional experts who are calling for a new 9/11 investigation has spurred many celebrities to use their public platforms to speak out, knowing that the press will at least have to address the issue.
The latest to do so is top comedian Margaret Cho, who told the Alex Jones Show yesterday that the public were going to become very angry when it was fully disclosed that the attacks were a conspiracy, concurring with fellow comedian George Carlin who also questioned the official story last year. Read HERE

Saturday, March 15, 2008

911 discussed at the European Parliament

Monday, March 03, 2008

Desperate Smear Campaign Follows Actress Marion Cotillard’s 9/11 Comments

Oscar-winning French actress Marion Cotillard’s comments regarding her doubts about the official 9/11 story have already provoked an international media smear campaign despite the fact that she is merely echoing a plethora of other highly respected public figures in questioning the establishment position.
During a French television interview, Cotillard said the public had been lied to about the terror attacks and highlighted the bizarre collapse of the twin towers in comparison with other buildings, specifically Madrid’s Windsor Building, which burned intensely for over 24 hours yet did not implode like the WTC. Read HERE

Tuesday, February 12, 2008

Main japanese opposition party questions 9/11

On Friday, January 10, 2008 the Japanese government has taken rare steps to force parliamentary approval of a controversial bill reviving a naval mission in the Indian Ocean in support of US-led forces in Afghanistan. Councilor Yukihisa Fujita of Democratic Party of Japan, made a statement at the House of Councillors, the National Diet (parliament) of Japan. He explained that in the USA many people doubt the official version of 9/11 and numerous websites and scientists have collected evidence that contradicts the governments version.He presented several largescale photographs of: the Pentagon´s entry and exit holes, the flight path towards the Pentagon,the exploding WTC towers and the WTC 7 collapse.Full Story and Videos of the event HERE

Tortured Patsies To Take Fall For 9/11

After half a dozen years of waterboarding, genital zapping, sleep deprivation and brainwashing, the Pentagon has finally found six patsies who will readily welcome their 72 virgins and take the fall for 9/11, providing debunkers with ample ammunition to dismiss questions about the gaping holes in the official story of the terror attacks.
"Among those held at Guantanamo is Khalid Sheik Mohammed, the suspected mastermind of the attack six years ago in which hijacked planes were flown into buildings in New York and Washington. Five others are expected to be named in sworn charges," reports the Associated Press.
The fact that KSM's confession included a plan to target the Plaza Bank building in Washington state, which was not founded until 2006, four years after the alleged Al-Qaeda mastermind's arrest, should provide a clue as to the reliability of the "terror mastermind's" culpability for 9/11.Read full story by Paul Joseph Watson HERE

Friday, December 07, 2007

Painful Deceptions

911-Evidence To The Contrary

Friday, November 02, 2007

Martin Sheen Questions Official 9/11 Story

Smoking gun testimony, demolition detonations reported by top brass in official statement
The rank of this witness is:CAPTAIN KARIN DESHORE OF BATTALION 46
The second building was being demolished.
The complete interview is published

Wednesday, October 03, 2007

Why Did WTC 7's Rooftop Penthouse Collapse Ahead Of The Rest Of The Tower?

Why did the collapse of WTC 7 shortly after 5pm on September 11, 2001, begin with the fall of the rooftop penthouse located on the east end of the tower? Based on the following images, one can see that significant structural damage to the southeast face of WTC 7, directly below the penthouse (yellow circle), apparently did not exist. This conclusion can be based on the survival of the pedestrian bridge located near street level, directly below this rooftop penthouse (red circle). The absence of heavy structural steel from WTC 1 in the region of this bridge (right), virtually eliminates the possibility that significant damage to the southeast face of WTC 7, lead to the onset of WTC 7's collapse.By comparison, debris from the collapsing WTC 2 is known to have damaged the nearby Bankers Trust building. Debris from WTC 2 that impacted with the Bankers Trust building is clearly visible on the ground beneath the building itself.Publications such as 'Popular Mechanics' have repeatedly alleged that still unverified damage to WTC 7 lead to its collapse:
"On about a third of the face to the center and to the bottom — approximately 10 stories — about 25 percent of the depth of the building was scooped out."

Thursday, September 20, 2007

Flight 77..Where?

Wednesday, September 12, 2007


Tuesday, September 11, 2007

New Bin Laden Video: 100% Forgery

The newly released Osama Bin Laden video is a an iron clad forgery, and not even a good one at that. All references to current events made by the figure said to be Bin Laden occur at a point in the video where the picture freezes and only audio is present. Bin Laden also presents a pre recorded martyrdom video of one of the alleged 9/11 hijackers, Waleed al Shehri, who was reported by the BBC as still alive and well in Saudi Arabia.
Hits to Blogs such as this one have sky rocketed as they have been the first to point out the suspicious aspects of the video which has become public in full for the first time today:
Osama Bin Laden's widely publicized video address to the American people has a peculiarity that casts serious doubt on its authenticity: the video freezes at about 1 minute and 58 seconds, and motion only resumes again at 12:30. The video then freezes again at 14:02 remains frozen until the end. All references to current events, such as the 62nd anniversary of the U.S. atomic bombing of Japan, and Sarkozy and Brown being the leaders of France and the UK, respectively, occur when the video is frozen! The words spoken when the video is in motion contain no references to contemporary events and could have been (and likely were) made before the U.S. invasion of Iraq.
The audio track does appear to be in the voice of a single speaker. What I suspect was done is that an older, unreleased video was dubbed over for this release, with the video frozen when the audio track departed from that of the original video.
Watch the video:

The video may be downloaded as a 677 mb MPEG file here.
Also of note is the fact that when Bin Laden begins to talk about the 19 hijackers the video becomes jerky as if some of it has been edited out or altered.
Meanwhile ABC's The Blotter is reporting that a second tape from Osama bin Laden was recorded in the same location as the video released last week:
People in the intelligence community who have seen the tape feel it is directly related to the 9/11 anniversary since the al Qaeda leader introduces the prerecorded martyrdom video of one of the 9/11 hijackers, Waleed al Shehri.
Waleed al Shehri was one of the hijackers on American Airlines flight 11 that crashed into the North Tower of the World Trade Center.
No, actually Waleed al Shehri was not one of the hijackers on flight 11, as reported by the BBC and other mainstream media outlets shortly after 9/11. The report which was quickly memory-holed in the aftermath of the attacks stated:
Saudi Arabian pilot Waleed Al Shehri was one of five men that the FBI said had deliberately crashed American Airlines flight 11 into the World Trade Centre on 11 September.
His photograph was released, and has since appeared in newspapers and on television around the world.Now he is protesting his innocence from Casablanca, Morocco.
He told journalists there that he had nothing to do with the attacks on New York and Washington, and had been in Morocco when they happened. He has contacted both the Saudi and American authorities, according to Saudi press reports.
So ask yourself this, why is Osama Bin Laden under the impression that this man was on board flight 11, and why does he have a martyrdom video starring this man when this man is still alive and is not being held nor sought by the FBI in connection with 9/11?

The actual release of the video has been delayed in order to whip up a media frenzy ahead of the sixth anniversary of the attacks. US intelligence and mainstream media outlets have both had possession of the video for a number of days if not weeks now, it has only been leaked onto the internet today.
Yet reports continue to be written stating: "For the first time in nearly three years, the new-look bin Laden will be unveiled on television screens across the world when he releases a televised statement to mark the sixth anniversary of the September 11 attacks."
Osama Bin Laden does not control the US intelligence agencies or the mainstream media, there has been a conscious decision to delay the release of the video in order to give it maximum impact on the anniversary of 9/11. In this sense, even if you still choose to believe that the videos are authentic Al Qaeda productions in the face of all the evidence to the contrary, there is no denying that our own media at the behest of the government is using the tapes as propaganda.
The failure on the part of any mainstream media source to question or even to mention at all the highly suspect freezing in the video at the exact points where Bin Laden speaks of current events is scandalous and betrays a total lack of willingness to properly investigate and report accurate information.
To their credit some analysts have pointed out the wholly fake beard that "Osama" has apparently donned, while other apologists have attempted to pass it off as an "image change" for the terrorist leader, saying he has dyed his beard and hair in an attempt to appear younger and more stern, which some, including the intelligence agency linked SITE Institute, have laughably claimed is "common practice" amongst Muslim men. In reality it is wholly uncommon for Muslim men to dye their beards black.
Previously released Bin Laden videos have been revealed to be old footage dating from five years ago, yet have still been passed off as new by the mainstream media.
In our previous article, we outlined how almost every so-called "Al-Qaeda" tape has been released at the most politically opportune time for the Bush administration and the Neo-Cons.
We also emphasized the conclusions of our previous investigation concerning IntelCenter, the so-called "middleman" behind the As-Sahab terrorist media arm of Al-Qaeda and the public release of the tapes. In reality, all the evidence points to IntelCenter itself directly releasing the tapes in its role as a front for the military-industrial complex.
In addition, intelligence sources have made it clear that they see Adam Gadahn, aka Adam Pearlman, as the scriptwriter of the latest Osama Bin Laden video. The CIA would have us believe that Gadahn is "American Al Qaeda", the US citizen gone bad. However undertake a modicum of research into Gadahn and you will discover from mainstream news reports that he is a hardcore Jewish Zionist who once wrote stinging essays condemning Muslims as "bloodthirsty terrorists,".
The propaganda can be no better emphasized than with a cursory analysis of stills of the new video. Who added the new backdrop depicting a plane flying into an 11 and a 9? It certainly was not present in the actual video nor in stills released last week. So exactly who is helping Bin Laden out with his public image this week?
The continued perpetuation of this myth has reached the point of farce now. There can be no doubt anymore that these crudely edited and forged propaganda tapes that are being foisted upon the American people represent nothing more than a contrived Neo-Con hoax to reinforce the flagging official version of 9/11 and the legitimacy of the so-called war on terror.

How Did Human Remains End Up Miles From Flight 93's Crash Site?

"Finding the flight data recorder had been the focus of investigators as they widened their search area today following the discoveries of more debris, including what appeared to be human remains, miles from the point of impact at a reclaimed coal mine." [Pittsburgh Post Gazette, 09/13/01]
Have a good think about the above.Are we supposed to believe that hijackers armed with only box cutters forced an angry mob to jump from the plane seconds before the crash? Or are we supposed to believe that people simply felt compelled to jump from the plane? If the official story is true then people jumping from the plane is the only way human remains could have been found miles from Flight 93's crash site.A more logical explanation is that people inside the plane were sucked out because of a sudden depressurisation.
[R]elatives of Flight 93 passengers who heard the cockpit tape April 18 at a Princeton hotel said government officials laid out a timetable for the crash in a briefing and in a transcript that accompanied the recording. Relatives later reported they heard sounds of an on-board struggle beginning at 9:58 a.m., but there was a final "rushing sound" at 10:03, and the tape fell silent. [Philadelphia Daily News, 9/16/02]
The "rushing sound" indicates a depressurisation occurred.
A reason for the depressurisation:
"I know of two people - I will not mention names - that heard a missile," Stuhl said. "They both live very close, within a couple of hundred yards. . .This one fellow's served in Vietnam and he says he's heard them, and he heard one that day." The mayor adds that based on what he knows about that morning, military F-16 fighter jets were "very, very close." [phillynews.com, 11/15/01]
Corroborative evidence?
Click images for full size
United said Flight 93 left Newark at 8:01 a.m. with 38 passengers, two pilots and five flight attendants. Minutes before the 10 a.m. crash, an emergency dispatcher in Pennsylvania received a cell phone call from a man who said he was a passenger locked in a bathroom aboard United Flight 93.
The man repeatedly said the call was not a hoax, said dispatch supervisor Glenn Cramer in neighboring Westmoreland County. "We are being hijacked, we are being hijacked!" Cramer quoted the man from a transcript of the call.
The man told dispatchers the plane "was going down. He heard some sort of explosion and saw white smoke coming from the plane and we lost contact with him," Cramer said. FBI agent Wells Morrison wouldn't confirm that the plane was hijacked, but said the FBI was reviewing the tape of the 911 call.
"At this point, we're not prepared to say it was an act of terrorism, though it appears to be that," Morrison said. Reporters were taken to the top of a hill overlooking the scene. The crash left a V-shaped gouge in a grassy field surrounded by thick woods, just below a hilltop strip mine. The gouge is 8- to 10-feet deep and 15- to 20-feet long, said Capt. Frank Monaco of the Pennsylvania State Police.

America's Number One Collapse Expert Thought WTC Bombed

A man described as "the premiere collapse expert in the country" thought the collapse of the south tower of the WTC was caused by explosives and not jet fuel, before the implosion of the north tower killed him on 9/11.

Thursday, August 30, 2007

New Film:The 911 Ripple Effect

Friday, August 24, 2007

More proof bombs were planted in the buildings!

Friday, May 18, 2007

Close up of bombs going off in Building7

Friday, March 30, 2007

Tower Blueprints

click on image to view all blueprints
Surviving Evidence of the World Trade Center Attack
The blueprints to the Twin Towers and Building 7 remained off-limits to the public for more than five years after the attack, despite the fact that the buildings were built with public money and that the engineering drawings of public buildings are supposed to be public information. Incredibly, the team of engineers from the ASCE that conducted the only investigation of the building "collapses" before Ground Zero had been cleaned up lacked access to the buildings' blueprints -- at least until they signed waivers that they would not use the evidence in a lawsuit against the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey.

Hats off to Rosie O'Donnell

Rosie O'Donnell 9/11 Rant Reaches 30 Million Viewers!
Rosie O'Donnell is certainly not backing away from her public stance about 9/11, and this morning on The View went on a 9 minute rant about the many questions surrounding the attack, reaching around 30 million viewers in the process.
This is the largest single exposure 9/11 truth has enjoyed to date and it represents a watershed moment in the quest to bring the truth to the masses.

Wednesday, March 28, 2007


Pilots for 9/11 Truth, an international organization of pilots and aviation professionals, petitioned the National Transportation and Safety Board (NTSB) via the Freedom of Information Act to obtain their 2002 report, “Flight Path Study-American Airlines Flight 77″, consisting of a Comma Separated Value (CSV) file and Flight Path Animation, allegedly derived from Flight 77’s Flight Data Recorder (FDR).
The data provided by the NTSB contradict the 9/11 Commission Report in several significant ways...READ HERE

Sunday, March 25, 2007

WTC 7: Silverstein's "Pull It"Explanation Examined

On September 9, 2005, Mr. Dara McQuillan, a spokesman for Silverstein Properties, issued the following statement [on the issue of Larry Silverstein's "pull it" comment]:
Seven World Trade Center collapsed at 5:20 p.m. on September 11, 2001, after burning for seven hours. There were no casualties, thanks to the heroism of the Fire Department and the work of Silverstein Properties employees who evacuated tenants from the building. ...In the afternoon of September 11, Mr. Silverstein spoke to the Fire Department Commander on site at Seven World Trade Center. The Commander told Mr. Silverstein that there were several firefighters in the building working to contain the fires. Mr. Silverstein expressed his view that the most important thing was to protect the safety of those firefighters, including, if necessary, to have them withdraw from the building.

Thursday, March 22, 2007

Huge Amounts Of Smoke Came From WTC 5 & 6 NOT WTC 7

Here is a separate image revealing the extent of the fires in WTC 5 . Despite raging infernos and debris gouging huge holes in the building, and in comparative size significantly more severe fires than the twin towers or Building 7 - the building stood while the other three all collapsed.
The burned out husk of Building 5 two days after 9/11. Building 5 sustained massive damage from flaming aircraft parts which ignited fires that burned for hours. In addition, the collapse of the north tower scraped down the side of 5 but its modest nine floors did not structurally collapse. Read the full article at INFOWARS.COM by clicking HERE

Saturday, March 17, 2007

KSM "Confessed" To Attacking Bank Founded After His Arrest

Fallacy of testimony exposed as story blows up in Pentagon's face
Khalid Shaikh Mohammed's alleged confession testimony has been thoroughly discredited after it emerged that one of the targets he identified, the Plaza Bank, was not founded until 2006, four years after the alleged Al-Qaeda mastermind's arrest.

Thursday, March 15, 2007

9/11 suspect 'confesses'

In a list of attacks - some of which were carried out and some not - Mohammed claimed responsibility for planning, financing and training others for plots ranging from the 1993 truck bombing of the World Trade Centre to the attempt by would-be shoe bomber Richard Reid to blow up a transatlantic flight with explosives hidden in his shoes.
The September 11 attacks, the Bali bombing and plots against British targets were among the confessions of Khalid Sheikh Mohammed during a military hearing at Guantanamo Bay.
According to a transcript released by the Pentagon, Mohammed said in a statement read during the session: "I was responsible for the 9/11 operation from A to Z,"In all, Mohammed, who is believed to have been the number three al Qaeda leader, said he was responsible for planning 28 individual attacks. The comments were included in a 26-page transcript released by the Pentagon, which blacked out some of his remarks.
Mohammed also claimed he was tortured by the CIA after his capture in 2003 in Pakistan, according to an exchange he had with the military colonel who heads the three-member panel that heard his case behind closed doors!

Wednesday, March 14, 2007

UA93 : The Hijackers 9/11 Truth - by Terrorcell

Excellent new short film about the alleged hijackers of Flight 93.
After watching it, you’ll walk away realizing that if Flight 93 was hijacked, it wasn’t by the alleged four the FBI said it was.Thanks to Killtown & Terrorcell

Saturday, March 03, 2007

Internet Archive Confirms BBC Video was BEFORE WTC7 Collapse

Internet Archive just posted the following message:

"Two of the much discussed BBC are available again, but this time as streaming flash files.



Based on the analysis of the time codes, the engineer involved is certain that the BBC was talking about the collapse before the building was reported to have collapsed on the www.911timeline.net site.

Digital Librarian"

Brewster is apparently Brewster Kahle, Digital Librarian, Director and Co-Founder of the Internet Archive.

Thank you to 911 blogger for this post

Friday, March 02, 2007

Time Stamp Confirms BBC Reported WTC 7 Collapse 26 Minutes In Advance

If there was any remaining doubt that the BBC reported the collapse of
Building 7 over 20 minutes before it fell then it has now evaporated with
the discovery of footage from the BBC's News 24 channel that shows the
time stamp at 21:54 (4:54PM EST) when news of the Salomon Brothers
Building is first broadcast, a full 26 minutes in advance of its collapse.
This News 24 clip can be seen at the end of the BBC World report in
the video HERE

Another Smoking Gun? Now CNN Jumps the Gun: On 911 CNN
Announced WTC 7 "Has Either Collapsed or is Collapsing" Over
an Hour Before it Fell!(see the video below while you can)

BBC Has Lost Tapes Of 21st Century's Defining Moment

9/11 coverage gone due to "cock up". Why is this not a world news headline?

It has come to light this week that the most pre-eminent broadcasting company in the world has lost the original recordings of its output for the entire day on September 11th 2001, just over five years on, yet no major news agency has even bothered to report the fact.
Despite being currently the biggest story on the internet and in the alternative media, the only place in the mainstream the story has appeared is on a small German news website.

Email the BBC HERE Add this in the comments box not forgetting to say you are referring to wtc 7 etc; "As a citizen of the UK and a BBC license payer I demand an explanation as to what has happened to at least three copies of BBC news footage of a moment in time that will define history. I want to know PRECISE DETAILS of when the tapes were last checked, how they could have simply vanished and who is ultimately responsible and so should all other UK residents."
Thank you to Steve Watson atINFOWARS.NET

Owner of wtc complex saying 'pull it' re:wtc 7

Just in case you missed it....

Why No One Could Have Predicted The Collapse Of WTC 7

This week has seen a cornucopia of news come pouring forth with regards to what happened to World Trade Center building 7 on September 11th 2001. The catalyst for this has been the discovery that the BBC reported the building had collapsed a full thirty minutes before it actually fell on 9/11.
The BBC, instead of attempting to explain how it could have reported this, has attempted to both evade and cloud the issue. The truth is that no one could have possibly predicted the building would collapse and here's why...

Media Blacklists BBC Fiasco; Google, Digg Censor 9/11 Truth

The crowned kings of censorship Google have "pulled" the News 24 "timestamp" video that shows the BBC reporting the collapse of Building 7 26 minutes before it happened. Meanwhile, the establishment media continues to ignore the WTC 7 farce as a whole, including the inconceivable notion that BBC World have mysteriously lost all their 9/11 footage.

Thursday, March 01, 2007

CNN, BBC 24 Reports Conclusively Prove Media Prior Knowledge and False-Start Scripting of Building 7 Controlled Demolition

It has now been discovered that BBC 24 also reported the Building 7 collapse before it fell. Furthermore, CNN’s Aaron Brown reported that Building 7 "has collapsed or is collapsing" over an hour before it fell.
These clips both reinforce the shocking, newly discovered BBC coverage wherein Jane Standley reports the collapse early-- with the building still standing behind her.

WTC Building 3 Was Heavily Damaged by the Collapse of Tower 2, Yet Did Not Collapse Uniformly.See photo above.
CLICK HERE For full report

Tuesday, February 27, 2007

BBC World reports WTC 7 collapse BEFORE it happens!


You will note that the female reporter Jane Standley (seen left) is telling
the world that the building has collapsed when you can see it in the
background over her left shoulder Then at 5:15pm EST, just five minutes
before the building did actually collapse, her live connection from New
York to London conveniently fails!

Thank you to cremation of care webmaster Joseph Skelton

Wednesday, February 14, 2007

Flight 93

A news reporter says in this clip that the debris was spread over a 4 mile area.In fact it was more like 8 miles.How can a plane crash then completely dissappear yet pieces of wreckage be found 8 miles away?.Donald Rumsfeld actually mentioned 'the plane over a field in Pennsylvania that was shot down' in a tv broadcast(the video of this is HERE)

Pentagon Attack

Alot of people ask why i post so many videos as evidence. A picture paints a thousand words. It also gives the viewer the chance to make up their own minds moreso rather than me telling them 'how it is'. Most of the video evidence consists of actual footage of the events anyway. And most investigators to a crime don't have such a luxury!..Go ahead INVESTIGATE.

A brief science lesson

The commentator in this short video explains why it could have been a missile that hit the Pentagon.I know this is a very popular theory and the guy in this clip says that it was definitely a missile but, do your own research. A very interesting clip all the same.

Tuesday, February 13, 2007

My name REMOVED from 10 downing street petition to reinvestigate 9/11

On my homepage there is a link which takes you to an online petition on the 10 Downing Street website. Some weeks ago it was reported that names were being systematically removed, especially names with a connection to the 911 truth movement, i believe RINF .com was one of the names removed at the time.I signed this petition some time ago and you can view by the screenshot i took at the time and the one i took today..something strange has happened..MY ENTRY HAS BEEN DELETED..look at the names circled and see how the names before and after my name are still present.This stinks. Government censorship anyone..no of course not what do I know..i'm just a conspiracy fruitcake with a tinfoil hat!

My posts have been deleted!!!!!!

Regarding the post below. I have just returned to the 9/11 discussion and all but one of my posts have been deleted!. Now you may think this is because they were offensive or contained some form of foul language but no.All of my posts raised awareness to important 9/11 issues and i posted material which is contained on this page..nothing too untoward you may think.Again as i have said before, watch the documentary on BBC2 on Sunday but be aware, it may be censored , it may have been made by the same narrowminded fascist idiots who deleted my posts. Yes i know i am being paranoid..just had to let off some steam.Do you see what we are up against. Keep the population dumbed down,let the idiotically misinformed have the spotlight,spread the misinformation,keep taking your vaccines,anti-depressants,Ritalin,keep watching the TV, read the latest on your favourite celebrity,keep doing your crappy little jobs,pay your taxes,save for your pension you are never going to recieve,believe what you read in the papers,accept your ID cards,enrol your children on the childrens register and remember your government loves you...you get my point.

Discussion on 911

I have just taken part in a discussion forum on msn.The topic was 9/11. I posted 12 or comments THEN WAS BANNED.Some freedom of speech eh?.While i was presenting evidence of government foreknowledge,complicity,wtc building 7 info etc etc; others were making mindless contributions and posting material which dismissed people who believed such material ,as on this site ,as nutjobs and fruitcakes.Why haven't they been stopped ? Here is the link to the forumHERE My postings are under the name 'Drewp'.Below is the message i recieved when i tried to post more.

Add your response
This Windows Live ID account has been banned from this forum. While banned, you may browse the message boards and read messages contributed by other users. You may not create new messages, edit existing messages or delete old messages. The ban will be lifted 14/02/07 12:38.

Monday, February 12, 2007

NYPD Officer Heard Building 7 Bombs

"The whole time you're hearing boom, boom, boom, boom, boom. I think I know an explosion when I hear it"
READ HERE for the article which includes a short video
Thank you to INFOWARS for this piece

Daily Mail: fresh doubts over 9/11

The penny seems to have finally dropped for this Daily Mail reporter. Try to remain calm as you read some of the idiotic replies to this article at the end of the piece.

9/11 Goes mainstream.Upcoming BBC documentary

9/11: The Conspiracy Files /Sunday 18 February, 9pm on BBC 2 England. I hope this is an informed piece of work and not some dismissive attack on the 'conspiracy fruitcakes' (as we are often called). I will be watching anyway although i hardly expect a government institution such as the BBC to give it unbiased coverage.We can but hope.

Friday, February 09, 2007

Ground Zero EMT: We Were Told Building 7 Was to Be "Pulled"

A New Jersey EMT has gone public on how emergency workers were told that Building 7 was going to be "pulled," before a 20 second demolition countdown broadcast over radio preceded its collapse. The ground zero rescue worker also blows the whistle on how he witnessed multiple underground support columns of the WTC towers that had been severed before the buildings imploded.

Thank you to Infowars

Wolfowitz Warns of 'Surprise like Pearl Harbor' Months Before 9/11 Attacks

This surfacing video only reinforces the pre-meditation established by the Project for a New American Century (PNAC). Wolfowitz helped to pen the think tank's September 2000 document 'Rebuilding America's Defenses' which stated on pg. 51, amidst a larger call for dramatic military build-up, that:
"Further, the process of transformation, even if it brings revolutionary change, is likely to be a long one, absent some catastrophic and catalyzing event – like a new Pearl Harbor

Sunday, February 04, 2007

Only 16% Think Government Telling the Truth about 9/11

Many adults in the United States believe the current federal government has not been completely forthcoming on the issue of the 9/11 terrorist attacks, according to a poll by the New York Times and CBS News. 53 per cent of respondents think the Bush administration is hiding something, and 28 per cent believe it is lying.


9/11 The Myth & The Reality

Throughout this incredible video, enhanced with forceful images and video segments, Griffin details nine of the most commonly held myths and misconceptions about the events surrounding 9/11 and with logical precision proves the fallacies of each one.
Each speech is followed by an in-depth question & answer section featuring hard-hitting questions about 9/11 posed to one of the subject's foremost scholars.

True Lies Of 9/11:PART ONE


Wednesday, January 31, 2007

9/11 Truth: Traitors and Patriots

Monday, January 29, 2007

250+ 9/11 Smoking Guns

Over 250 pieces of evidence found in the mainstream media regarding prior knowledge/preperation/motives and operatives involved in the 9/11 attacks


Thursday, January 18, 2007

911 Press For Truth

Thursday, January 11, 2007

James Brolin on 9/11

Actor James Brolin plugs911weknow.comon U.S television interview and quickley gets cut off.

World famous director David Lynch on 9/11

David Lynch discusses his thoughts on 9/11,interspersed with clips from 'Loose Change'

Friday, December 15, 2006

Bush caught off guard

George bush caught off guard at a press conference when questioned as to wether or not he had prior knowledge of the 9/11 attacks.

If unable to view video above, right click and 'save as' HERE

What we saw

Amateur footage taken on 9/11.Listen as the observers mention what looked like 'a military plane' hit the second tower.

Boston Air Traffic Controller Says 9/11 An Inside Job

Knew people in FAA on day of hijackings who said intercept procedures should have been enacted as normal
CLICK HEREThank you to Infowars.comfor this piece

Bush-Linked Company Handled Security for the WTC

Marvin P. Bush, the president’s younger brother, was a principal in a company called Securacom that provided security for the World Trade Center, United Airlines, and Dulles International Airport. The company, Burns noted, was backed by KuwAm, a Kuwaiti-American investment firm on whose board Marvin Burns also served.
According to its present CEO, Barry McDaniel, the company had an ongoing contract to handle security at the World Trade Center
"up to the day the buildings fell down." What another amazing coincidence


False Flag Terrorism (definition)

False Flag Terrorism is where a government attacks its own people then blames it on others to justify its goals.
CLICK HERE for Wikipedia definition

Face The Facts

David Shayler (ex MI5 Intelligence Offficer) introduces 911 Truth Bristol's 'Face The Facts' and explains why 911 is of vital importance today.

9/11 Mysteries-A new public domain film.

9/11-7/7 'Coincidences'

On the morning of the attacks on 7/7 in London a training exercise was underway involving bombs going off at the same time and locations that they actually did!..sound familiar?(same scenario occurred on 9/11 in new york)...coincidence my left nut. Click on link to view story.
click here

Controlled Demolition-Steven Jones B.Y.U

Please follow the link below taking you to Prison planet and read the full story.
Scientific analysis on WTC steel debris undertaken by BYU Professor Steven Jones proves that the twin towers were demolished by means of incendiary devices and the release of the conclusive evidence is imminent.

click here

9/11 Scolars Symposium

Posted below is Prisonplanet.tv's four-camera shoot of the panel discussion held during the American Scholars Symposium that was covered by C-SPAN. This was definitely one of the most powerful moments from the historic 9/11 & The Neo-Con Agenda Symposium in Los Angeles featuring speeches and commentary by world-renowned experts who expose 9/11 as inside job including Webster Tarpley, Robert Bowman, Alex Jones, Steven E. Jones, and James Fetzer.
C-SPAN's online viewing options are pretty poor quality and this verison that was shot, produced and posted to Google Video by Prisonplanet.tv is much better looking.
Its crucial that people see and share this important information so please tell your friends and family, email co-workers about it, and post the link to message boards to help spread the word.

Putting 9/11 in Historical Context

This short film may give you some insight as to why the government engineered 911 and provides the viewer with past examples of their work.

Loose Change 2nd edition(recut)-911 truths,a film by Dylan Avery

Everybody should watch this film.It is possibly the most powerful insight into what really happened on 9/11